EARTH OF WALNUT - TOWN OF JOHN - SAINT PAUL STATE - BRAZIL
Cadê um pauzinho... cadê uma pauzinho... (Where have one chopstick... where have one chopstick...)
...para enfiar no Pixídio do Jequitibá para desentupir, o cachimbo. (...to stick in the Pixídio Jequitibá tree to unclog, the pipe.)
Humm!?!?!
Um mourão (pau) para cercar as propriedades. (A fence post (stick) to surround the property.)
(...)
The land will only become the property when the flock drivers are no longer closed and engaging in livestock - that is, as soon as they begin to treat the earth as a means (scarce) in order to control the movement of animals. For this, they have to control the land. This requires that the land be outlined some way, either through the construction of fences or some other obstacles that restrict the free flow of natural animals. Rather than being merely a factor that contributes to the production of flocks, the earth thus becomes a genuine production factor.
(..)
First, more goods were produced and correspondingly more needs could be met. In fact, this effect was the exact reason behind the land ownership: the realization that the earth has a causal connection with the satisfaction of human needs and that, moreover, it can be controlled.
Was to control the land that the fact that man began to produce goods rather than merely consuming them. (Important to note that this production of goods also involved save and store goods for later consumption). Second, and as a consequence of the first, the highest productivity achieved through savings (rational use) of land possible that a larger number of people could survive with a same amount of land. Indeed, it was estimated that the appropriation of land and the corresponding change of a life based on hunting and gathering to an existence based on agriculture and animal husbandry enabled a population of ten to one hundred times greater than the previous population could be sustained with the same amount of land.
However, the economization of the land was only part of the solution to the problem created by the growing population pressure. Through the land appropriation, there was a more effective use thereof, allowing a vastly larger population could be sustained. However, the institution of land ownership, by itself, did not affect the other side of the problem: the continuing proliferation of new shoots. This aspect of the problem also required a solution. It was necessary to create a social institution to leave this proliferation under control. And the institution created to consummate that goal was the family institution. As explained Thomas Malthus, to solve the problem of overpopulation, along with the institution of property, the "sex gender" also had to undergo fundamental changes.
(...)
Furthermore, and finally, with the formation of monogamous or polygamous families came another decisive innovation. Before, all members of a tribe formed a single, uniform family, and the division of intra-tribal work was essentially a division of intra-family work. With the advent of family formation came the fragmentation of even large family in several independent families, and with it came the formation of several private homes on the land.
(...)
(...)
The State was created to ensure the ownership of land, which was the main source of wealth known to the emergence of modern capitalism. From the economic viewpoint, the property would be a response to scarcity. Inequality of wealth arising from the social division of labor, the rise of the currency and usury, provided the concentration of ownership of land in the hands of a minority, who began to exercise increasing control over the means of production. New institutes emerged as the great estates, the mortgage and the availability of real estate. The new company, due to these economic conditions, divided into free men and slaves, in rich and poor exploited explorers. Then comes the State figure, for the elimination of class struggles and that, although born in order to contain social antagonisms, becomes an instrument of exploitation and oppression of the economically dominant class.
(...)
http://www.egov.ufsc.br/portal/conteudo/origem-da-fam%C3%ADlia-da-propriedade-privada-e-do-estado (Pt)
"(...) Many liberals believed it necessary to report, as a rule, and even sometimes exaggeratedly, exceptional cases where servants and slaves had been cruelly treated. But in no way constituted such excesses the rule. there were, of course, isolated cases of abuse, and the fact that there are such cases constituted one more reason for abolition of the system. However, as a rule, the treatment of slaves by their masters was humane and gentle. "(...) Against this objection in favor of slavery, there is only one argument that can and, in fact, denies all others: that free labor is incomparably more productive than slave labor. (...) We condemn involuntary servitude, not in spite of the fact that it is advantageous to "gentlemen" but because we believe that, ultimately it hurts the interests of all members of human society, including "gentlemen".
"Private ownership of the means of production is the regulating principle that within a society, balances the limited means of livelihood available to the company with far less limited capacity increase in the number of consumers. By making the share of the social product of each member of society is dependent on the product economically imputed to him, that is, dependent on their work and their property, the killing of human beings due to the struggle for survival, as in Animal and plant kingdoms, is replaced by a reduction in the birth rate as a result of social forces. The 'moral restraint' - the limitations on the production of offspring imposed by social positions - replaces the battle for existence."
Pavão:
UM PAVÃO MACHO COM TRÊS FÊMEAS. (A PEACOCK MALE WITH THREE FEMALE.)
EXIBIDO! (FEATURED!)
----////----
----////----
Os Pavões "conversando" com o Galo e as Galinhas de Angola... (The Peacocks "talking" to the Rooster and Chickens of Angola...). UÉ! NÃO BRIGAM POR TERRITÓRIO? (UÉ! NOT FIGTH OVER TERRITORY?)
Animal Farm 1999
Posted on September 10, 2015
FORAM! (THEY LEFT!)
----////----
Katy Perry Peacock (live Rock in Rio - Brazil 2011 Live) HD
Posted September 25, 2011. (Rock in Rio - Brazil 2011 Live). DATE: 24/09/2011 BRAZIL LIVE Globo TV.
I wanna see your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock, cock
Your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock
I wanna see your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock, cock
Your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock
(...)
Your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock
I wanna see your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock, cock
Your peacock, cock, cock
Your peacock
(...)
JUN 29, 2015 @ 9:45 AM
How Katy Perry Became America's Top Pop Export: The Forbes Cover Story
SEE, "TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2015
JANUARY 27, BIRTHDAY PARTY MY GRANDFATHER, TACIT A. WALNUT (1916-2013)"
Square "John Yoseph Baptist Walnut (1825-1909)" - Town of John - Saint Paul State - Brazil
SABE O QUE AS MULHERES MERECEM... (KNOW WHAT WOMEN DESERVE...)
...UMA... (...A...)
..."PICA" DESSE "TAMANHO"! PROCRIAR! (..."STICK" THIS "SIZE"! PROCREATE!)
photos: http://profemernogueira.blogspot.com.br/2015/06/festa-de-sao-joao-baptista-joanopolis_79.html
----////----
JEQUITIBÁ TREE 3,000 YEARS +-
----////----
[KAPOK TREE]
----////----
HUMM!!!
ESTOU SENDO VIGIADO, "FIO"! (I'M BEING GUARDED, "SON"!)
ÉMER* MARTINS** WALNUT JUNK IN THE BATHROOM OLD OF SLAVES BLACK.
* Emer+son=Son of Elmer. Teutonic origin. FAMOUS FOR WAR.
**Martins is a Spanish surname, patronymic regarded as Martin and Martino, a name that comes from the Latin Martinus Martinici or warlike meaning. Some books consider this name to be short for Mars (the god of war).
Photos in the Fujifilm FinePix SL310.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário